4 ms·
More generally, the "likeness" of someone should remain in their control. I don't thing anybody wants their image used by someone else without their consent. T
by jrimbault 9y ago
More generally, the "likeness" of someone should remain in their control.
I don't thing anybody wants their image used by someone else without their consent. There are already provisions for that in laws for photography in some countries.
I'm thinking specifically about the laws in France where you can't take a picture of someone without their consent. A picture is "of someone" when that someone is clearly a subject on the picture and not background.
- bsenftner 9y agoMost actor contracts require talent to sell that right if that want to "work on the big franchises".
- dsr_ 9y agoIt could reasonable be limited to the likeness of the actor for the purpose of making this movie, and simultaneous production of documentary, commentary, and publicity, marketing and advertising directly relating to this movie. If they want your likeness on action figures and other toys, demand extra.