3 ms·

The language is pretty poor - "bait" "lure" etc. They might as well have written ITS A TRAP. As I read it, I felt enough spin to not fully trust the point abou

The language is pretty poor - "bait" "lure" etc. They might as well have written ITS A TRAP. As I read it, I felt enough spin to not fully trust the point about maids at the end. Was it cherry picked item from a whole slew of legal relaxations for its shame value or is it really an isolated, important and notable act presented dispassionately? I can't tell.

seanmcdirmid 9y ago
Those aren’t very strong words, I don’t get the same word sentiment as you do, I’m also a native English speaker.
- duncanawoods 9y ago
  Bait specifically, is a pejorative form of incentive. It has many negative meanings including deception, trapping, tormenting, teasing, bait-and-switch etc. There is a range of less emotive language to choose from and I can't read such a thing without assuming intentionality. For example, have you ever heard of Google "baiting employees with free food"? I haven't. To do so is to describe setting up a trap. Instead its positive language: perks, incentives, benefits etc.
  - seanmcdirmid 9y ago
    It really depends on the context. For example "baiting employees with free food" seems completely innocuous to me. Everyone knows what is up, nothing nefarious is going on. Journalism involves using colorful words to make the article colorful enough to read. Even the Chinese media does this, it isn't just an American thing. Articles that aren't read are worthless.
    - duncanawoods 9y ago
      Hmm. Its interesting to hear a different view but I can't agree. Language has tremendous power and using it to signal to the reader whether they should approve of something in what might claim to be objective factual reporting is quite insidious to me. I strongly dislike the "journalism using colorful words" and China comparison as a defence of deception and manipulation. Our standards should be higher. Plenty of room for colour with good quality writing. (edit: just to clarify the article is question raised my spin flags but only to a level that is within the lazy-writing/unconscious-bias zone too)
      - seanmcdirmid 9y ago
        The original post said this was an example "western media bias", my comparison to Chinese media was to diffuse that point. Journalists who write in the manner you prescribe don't last long if they exist at all. No one wants to read such sanitized drivel.

seanmcdirmid 9y ago

Those aren’t very strong words, I don’t get the same word sentiment as you do, I’m also a native English speaker.

duncanawoods 9y ago
Bait specifically, is a pejorative form of incentive. It has many negative meanings including deception, trapping, tormenting, teasing, bait-and-switch etc. There is a range of less emotive language to choose from and I can't read such a thing without assuming intentionality. For example, have you ever heard of Google "baiting employees with free food"? I haven't. To do so is to describe setting up a trap. Instead its positive language: perks, incentives, benefits etc.
- seanmcdirmid 9y ago
  It really depends on the context. For example "baiting employees with free food" seems completely innocuous to me. Everyone knows what is up, nothing nefarious is going on. Journalism involves using colorful words to make the article colorful enough to read. Even the Chinese media does this, it isn't just an American thing. Articles that aren't read are worthless.
  - duncanawoods 9y ago
    Hmm. Its interesting to hear a different view but I can't agree. Language has tremendous power and using it to signal to the reader whether they should approve of something in what might claim to be objective factual reporting is quite insidious to me. I strongly dislike the "journalism using colorful words" and China comparison as a defence of deception and manipulation. Our standards should be higher. Plenty of room for colour with good quality writing. (edit: just to clarify the article is question raised my spin flags but only to a level that is within the lazy-writing/unconscious-bias zone too)
    - seanmcdirmid 9y ago
      The original post said this was an example "western media bias", my comparison to Chinese media was to diffuse that point. Journalists who write in the manner you prescribe don't last long if they exist at all. No one wants to read such sanitized drivel.