3 ms·

I think they're talking about an implied decimal point, i.e. fixed point math.

• vidarh 9y ago
  Yes, but the question is in part why use an implied decimal point instead of an implied binary point. You can do fixed binary point just by treating everything past a given bit as the fraction - it's simpler. The main reason would be differences in expected precision/rounding behavior depending on how many bits you use past the binary/decimal point. E.g. if you use 4 bits past the point, you can represent 1/10's in decimal but 1/16's in binary. But while the binary representation offers more precision, it allows you to represent different values. If you e.g. want to represent 0.2, a single decimal represented in 4 bits will allow you to do that, but with 4 bits past a binary decimal point means you'll need to round down to 0.1875 (3/16) or up to 0.25 (4/16).
  • valarauca1 9y ago
    if your dealing with currencies you can’t use fractions. Unrepresentative decimal values (.33, .34, .66) are non trivial without many bits of fraction space. Your IEEE standard for floating points has a lot of complex rules and standard binary layouts to ensure these values are represented. You end up needing a lot more space and rules than just diving by 10^3
    • vidarh 9y ago
      Of course you can use fractions. You can't reasonably use binary fractions. But the discussion is about fixed point representations, not floating point anyway.