3 ms·
I feel like they will get sued for that extremely quickly, considering their dominating position (Chrome) and being in the ad-serving business at the same time.
by olegkikin 9y ago
I feel like they will get sued for that extremely quickly, considering their dominating position (Chrome) and being in the ad-serving business at the same time.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5a/Browser_usage_share%2C_2009%E2%80%932016%2C_StatCounter.svg/1200px-Browser_usage_share%2C_2009%E2%80%932016%2C_StatCounter.svg.png https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5a/Br...
- mtgx 9y agoTechnically the advertising industry is behind this move. Whether or not that will hold in court, it remains to be seen.
- xstartup 9y agoThis kind of move is unlikely, nearly no one is running "legit" ad business. No one would like to to be under a microscope either.
- azernik 9y agoGenerally American and European anti-trust law as currently interpreted only cares about harm to the consumer.
- i_cant_speel 9y agoLess competition is generally harmful to the consumer.
- avs733 9y agoconceptually. However, the metric we use to dictacte that conceptual argument is what screws us (Americans). We have chosen increase in price as the primary metric. It becomes the responsibility of the accuser to prove and provide evidence of increased prices based on monopoly position. The Exponent podcast did a nice description of this last summer I believe (not sure what episode).
- chopin 9y agoAt least in Europe Google has been successfully sued by competitors.