4 ms·
I know there are a lot of code review tools, but with GITHUB and all the tools they make available, I wonder why the other code-review tools are still being dev
by alphaIuGN59 9y ago
I know there are a lot of code review tools, but with GITHUB and all the tools they make available, I wonder why the other code-review tools are still being developed/maintained.
- skittleson 9y agoI wonder that too. Even competing code review tools are very similar.
- not_kurt_godel 9y ago> GITHUB Off-topic, but I'm genuinely curious why you chose this capitalization?
- dingo_bat 9y agoMy wife often types complete messages in caps. I asked her why she was shouting, and she told me she doesn't consider it shouting at all. To her there's no difference between typing in small letters and all caps.
- majewsky 9y agoI see this fairly often that somehow a group of users collectively decides that a certain name has to be typed in all-caps. Whenever someone asks me a question about SWIFT, I tell them I have no idea about fintech, but I can instead answer any questions they have about Swift. But it's an uphill battle. (OpenStack Swift, that is, not Apple Swift. And not Suzuki Swift either.)
- _asummers 9y agoMy favorite is when people capitalize LISP. It's not 1958 anymore, we can just say Lisp now.
- alphaIuGN59 9y agoNo reason really.. Probably unconciouslly highlighted GITHUB :)
- TheAceOfHearts 9y agoOther tools are developed and maintained to stimulate competition and avoid vendor lock-in. Monocultures are dangerous. One example of a use-case where GitHub falls short is offline support: you can't take the issue tracker and wiki with you. There are alternative tools such as fossil [0] which have built-in bug tracking and wiki, which is an attractive feature for some people. [0] https://fossil-scm.org/ https://fossil-scm.org/
- dtech 9y agoI think you're right about the issue tracker, but the wiki is just another git repo [1] that you can checkout, commit and push. [1] https://help.github.com/articles/adding-and-editing-wiki-pages-locally/ https://help.github.com/articles/adding-and-editing-wiki-pag...
- TheAceOfHearts 9y agoThanks for sharing. I wasn't aware this feature was available on GitHub. I like fossil because it's all built-in and can be wrapped up in a single file. But it's always great to have more choices available.
- alphaIuGN59 9y agoYeah.. this is one thing I recently discovered. I use github for my personal projects, and was going to start using the issue tracker to keep track of the bugs. But then I realized that if I do that if I do start tracking bugs on github, I will pretty much be tied to github. Hopefully gitlab or bitbucket comes up with a solution which enables the owners of the repos to move bugs/issue tracking, which will force github to enable this feature as well.
- shurcooL 9y agoYou can actually access a mirror of Go’s issue tracker (hosted on GitHub) offline by using a tool [0]. Of course, a lot of code was written to make it possible, and it’s a read-only view. [0] https://godoc.org/golang.org/x/build/maintner/cmd/maintserve https://godoc.org/golang.org/x/build/maintner/cmd/maintserve