3 ms·
I'm honestly not quite sure how to interpret this. To me the idea seems bonkers. Even if I didn't try to eat more plant than animal, it would seem bonkers. Fr
by Djvacto 9y ago
I'm honestly not quite sure how to interpret this.
To me the idea seems bonkers. Even if I didn't try to eat more plant than animal, it would seem bonkers.
From what I've read, eating more meat is likely to increase the risk of bowel cancer [1](https://www.cancercouncil.com.au/21639/cancer-information/cancer-risk-and-prevention/healthy-weight-diet-and-exercise/meat-and-cancer/ https://www.cancercouncil.com.au/21639/cancer-information/ca...)
Additionally, it's way, way harder to get all your vitamins and nutrients with only meats, especially while maintaining a variety of macronutrient options, but I don't really have a source for that, just mental math and experience.
- ha8o8le 9y agoGoing to the extreme and eating only meat is a bit bonkers. The main problem with our diet and what causes the most disease and death are carbs and sugar. Take a look at this regarding nutrients and plants http://www.zoeharcombe.com/2014/04/the-perfect-five-a-day/ http://www.zoeharcombe.com/2014/04/the-perfect-five-a-day/ I have been researching all sides of this for 6 months now for a doc http://foodlies.org http://foodlies.org so I'm very familiar with a ll the arguments and studies on both sides.