5 ms·

Can someone explain to me why are we sending a Tesla to Mars? I mean other than shits and giggles, is there any value in having it there? I assume putting stuff

by dudus 9y ago

Can someone explain to me why are we sending a Tesla to Mars? I mean other than shits and giggles, is there any value in having it there? I assume putting stuff in the space is expensive and I wonder if that effort couldn't have gone to something more useful like a robot to look for water or whatever.

zanedb 9y ago
> other than shits and giggles, is there any value in having it there? Nope.
mullen 9y ago
This was a test flight so they could send anything they wanted, so they did.
InclinedPlane 9y ago
First flight of this vehicle configuration so it's a test flight. Most other test flights would just use a concrete mass simulator. Elon thought of something more interesting.
adventured 9y ago
The short answer is: no. You're talking about an entirely different mission profile, at far greater difficulty and at a radically greater cost. You need an advanced robot, reliable, highly tested, constructed by the best rover engineers on the planet. You need to spend years designing the overall program. You need to deliver the robot safely to the surface of Mars. You need to operate the program at non-trivial cost for an extended period of time to then look for water etc. Add a few billion dollars to the cost, basically.
marvin 9y ago
This was a demonstration launch, so no paying customer. The alternatives are (1) sending a rock or (2) spending months and millions of dollars designing a spacecraft capable of doing something useful. Option 2 is out of the question, option 1 is boring :)
heathn 9y ago
It's not going to mars. It is in an orbit that could go to mars if that was the desire, this is just a test. A silly, awesome test.
scrumper 9y ago
You’d have to pay - a lot - to develop the robot (and control its mission). There was a car already lying around.
outworlder 9y ago
For it to go to the mars we would have to be at the correct transfer window (or have a much higher Delta-V margin, which maybe BFR would be able to manage, but not necessarily Falcon Heavy). So it is not going to Mars. Then, there are other costs. Cost of launch could have been absorbed by Tesla. Cost of developing a mars-capable payload would be extra. Who would pay for it, on a completely new and experimental rocket?

by dudus 9y ago

zanedb 9y ago

> other than shits and giggles, is there any value in having it there? Nope.

mullen 9y ago

This was a test flight so they could send anything they wanted, so they did.

InclinedPlane 9y ago

First flight of this vehicle configuration so it's a test flight. Most other test flights would just use a concrete mass simulator. Elon thought of something more interesting.

adventured 9y ago

The short answer is: no. You're talking about an entirely different mission profile, at far greater difficulty and at a radically greater cost. You need an advanced robot, reliable, highly tested, constructed by the best rover engineers on the planet. You need to spend years designing the overall program. You need to deliver the robot safely to the surface of Mars. You need to operate the program at non-trivial cost for an extended period of time to then look for water etc. Add a few billion dollars to the cost, basically.

marvin 9y ago

This was a demonstration launch, so no paying customer. The alternatives are (1) sending a rock or (2) spending months and millions of dollars designing a spacecraft capable of doing something useful. Option 2 is out of the question, option 1 is boring :)

heathn 9y ago

It's not going to mars. It is in an orbit that could go to mars if that was the desire, this is just a test. A silly, awesome test.

scrumper 9y ago

You’d have to pay - a lot - to develop the robot (and control its mission). There was a car already lying around.

outworlder 9y ago

For it to go to the mars we would have to be at the correct transfer window (or have a much higher Delta-V margin, which maybe BFR would be able to manage, but not necessarily Falcon Heavy). So it is not going to Mars. Then, there are other costs. Cost of launch could have been absorbed by Tesla. Cost of developing a mars-capable payload would be extra. Who would pay for it, on a completely new and experimental rocket?