3 ms·

#1 'use strict' already went a long way to disabling broken parts of the language without breaking backwards compatibility. While what you are saying can be tru

by tomxor 9y ago

#1 'use strict' already went a long way to disabling broken parts of the language without breaking backwards compatibility. While what you are saying can be true in general, I find many of the features are more of a design correction that happen to work along side the old flawed way. Take 'var' vs 'let' / 'const' as an example.

marcosdumay 9y ago
What will they use once people are mostly using strict, but the language isn't yet good enough (because the keyword is already there, but it still isn't a good language)? Keep adding rules and break the compatibility of strict code, or forget about it and live with current problems forever?
- tzahola 9y ago
  “use very strict”
  - TomMarius 9y ago
    "use even stricter than very strict";