4 ms·

There's nothing low-quality about the touchbar on my mac. It works as expected with the added benefit of flexibility. People just like to knock on the #1 guy.

There's nothing low-quality about the touchbar on my mac. It works as expected with the added benefit of flexibility. People just like to knock on the #1 guy. It's easy and gets clicks.

dpark 9y ago
Lots of people also just don’t like the touch bar. I had one and found it useless and annoying. Previously one-touch things like adjusting the audio volume became multi-press affairs. I constantly bumped the touch bar when using the number keys, which was really fun when entering a phone number in Chrome, because it would throw me into the search bar. I would not call the touch bar low quality. I would call it useless. On a related note, the massive trackpad was the first one Apple has produced that bugged me. It got stuck in “drag” mode frequently because my palm would register as a touch point. It also didn’t always register clicks on the right edge. Still better than almost all other trackpads I’ve used. Disclosure: I work at Microsoft. Was testing the latest MacBook Pro for my own use.
- wjamesg 9y ago
  People sure do seem to love using “disclosure” statements around here to brag about where they work
  - dpark 9y ago
    It’s not a brag. It would feel unethical to criticize a competitor’s product without disclosing the obvious conflict of interest.
    - ianamartin 9y ago
      The Surface isn't a competitor. Zzzing! But seriously, I agree and approve of your disclosure.
- eanzenberg 9y ago
  Changing volume and brightness is a one touch-slide affair with extra control, i can change the setting way quicker than repeated key presses. Haven’t had a problem with the massive trackpad either.
wwweston 9y ago
If you like it, great. But the idea that people are just criticizing to knock on the #1 guy is a sloppy story. There are reasons for disliking the touchbar, particularly as a replacement for a row of keys. The tactile feedback from keys is missing. And the "flexibility" has its own problems -- for example, consider changing the audio volume with keys vs with the touchbar. With keys it's easy as pie to silence or incrementally change the volume without even interrupting your visual attention. The new interaction with the UI that requires a shift of your visual attention. You can't tap on a spot repeatedly for a few quick steps, because the UI transforms into a slider, which you have to reorient on, find the correct spot and drag around. Yeah, if I wanted to change the sound volume that way, I already had an option for it with the touchpad that's been there for decades and isn't any less conveniently located than the new touchbar. And in general that's the case. It's been easy to have point-and-slide control over arbitrary UI laptop elements as long as there've been touchpads. The difference between a touchscreen and touchpad is marginal. At some margins -- particularly the operation of pocket computers with a form factor about the size of a laptop touchpad -- that's been tremendously useful, but I don't see any evidence that anyone's come up with something that genuinely matters for laptops yet.
- MBCook 9y ago
  Honestly if they had kept the function row and put the Touch Bar above it instead of replacing it… I’m sure people would complain tons but I don’t think they would’ve had anywhere near the problems they’ve had.
- shadowfiend 9y ago
  In my experience, you rarely have to reorient on the slider, because touch-and-drag is a valid gesture on the volume and brightness sliders. i.e., you don't have to tap, find slider, touch-and-drag, you can just directly touch-and-drag the button. Doesn't work for very large changes due to where the buttons are, but it hits 90% of my use cases in a cleaner way than the old buttons did. I do have to flick my eyes down to find the button, but it doesn't bother me---fully understand it might bother others, though.
- eanzenberg 9y ago
  I guess I never got around to memorizing the location of the f-keys since I had to look down to use them as well. Having a dedicated position to change often-changing settings is more useful than a trackpad, which I’m assuming you mean that you just change the volume with a mouse in the system bar.

There's nothing low-quality about the touchbar on my mac. It works as expected with the added benefit of flexibility. People just like to knock on the #1 guy. It's easy and gets clicks.

dpark 9y ago

Lots of people also just don’t like the touch bar. I had one and found it useless and annoying. Previously one-touch things like adjusting the audio volume became multi-press affairs. I constantly bumped the touch bar when using the number keys, which was really fun when entering a phone number in Chrome, because it would throw me into the search bar. I would not call the touch bar low quality. I would call it useless. On a related note, the massive trackpad was the first one Apple has produced that bugged me. It got stuck in “drag” mode frequently because my palm would register as a touch point. It also didn’t always register clicks on the right edge. Still better than almost all other trackpads I’ve used. Disclosure: I work at Microsoft. Was testing the latest MacBook Pro for my own use.

wjamesg 9y ago
People sure do seem to love using “disclosure” statements around here to brag about where they work
- dpark 9y ago
  It’s not a brag. It would feel unethical to criticize a competitor’s product without disclosing the obvious conflict of interest.
  - ianamartin 9y ago
    The Surface isn't a competitor. Zzzing! But seriously, I agree and approve of your disclosure.
eanzenberg 9y ago
Changing volume and brightness is a one touch-slide affair with extra control, i can change the setting way quicker than repeated key presses. Haven’t had a problem with the massive trackpad either.

wwweston 9y ago

If you like it, great. But the idea that people are just criticizing to knock on the #1 guy is a sloppy story. There are reasons for disliking the touchbar, particularly as a replacement for a row of keys. The tactile feedback from keys is missing. And the "flexibility" has its own problems -- for example, consider changing the audio volume with keys vs with the touchbar. With keys it's easy as pie to silence or incrementally change the volume without even interrupting your visual attention. The new interaction with the UI that requires a shift of your visual attention. You can't tap on a spot repeatedly for a few quick steps, because the UI transforms into a slider, which you have to reorient on, find the correct spot and drag around. Yeah, if I wanted to change the sound volume that way, I already had an option for it with the touchpad that's been there for decades and isn't any less conveniently located than the new touchbar. And in general that's the case. It's been easy to have point-and-slide control over arbitrary UI laptop elements as long as there've been touchpads. The difference between a touchscreen and touchpad is marginal. At some margins -- particularly the operation of pocket computers with a form factor about the size of a laptop touchpad -- that's been tremendously useful, but I don't see any evidence that anyone's come up with something that genuinely matters for laptops yet.

MBCook 9y ago
Honestly if they had kept the function row and put the Touch Bar above it instead of replacing it… I’m sure people would complain tons but I don’t think they would’ve had anywhere near the problems they’ve had.
shadowfiend 9y ago
In my experience, you rarely have to reorient on the slider, because touch-and-drag is a valid gesture on the volume and brightness sliders. i.e., you don't have to tap, find slider, touch-and-drag, you can just directly touch-and-drag the button. Doesn't work for very large changes due to where the buttons are, but it hits 90% of my use cases in a cleaner way than the old buttons did. I do have to flick my eyes down to find the button, but it doesn't bother me---fully understand it might bother others, though.
eanzenberg 9y ago
I guess I never got around to memorizing the location of the f-keys since I had to look down to use them as well. Having a dedicated position to change often-changing settings is more useful than a trackpad, which I’m assuming you mean that you just change the volume with a mouse in the system bar.