4 ms·
Perhaps, but in the context of the article, traffic jams only exist because of commuters. The interstate & highway systems were not designed for commuters and s
by rbranson 16y ago
Perhaps, but in the context of the article, traffic jams only exist because of commuters. The interstate & highway systems were not designed for commuters and should not be used for them. While I think computer-driven cars will be a boon to the environment and economy, the capital investment needed is pretty fantastic, which is going to be some decades off.
In fact, a real solution to this problem that could be applied in the design of our current urban landscape would be a multi-pronged effort to spread out the commuter traffic. Alternating work and school hours could widen commuting hours and distribute load across all commuter infrastructure. Increased levels of telecommuting would also contribute to this. This would be a sort of supply-side fix to commuter congestion. Local or regional governments could create incentives to encourage these changes.
- nradov 16y agoThe first-generation interstate highway system wasn't designed for commuters, but everything added or upgraded in the past 40 years has been. Many new luxury cars already come with limited computer driving, in the form of adaptive cruise control. The capital investment is small and rapidly dropping, and just that one innovation could deliver a major reduction in traffic congestion. http://www.springerlink.com/content/p56714553g82r2h7/ http://www.springerlink.com/content/p56714553g82r2h7/
- dandelany 16y agothe capital investment needed is pretty fantastic As opposed to, say, the multi-billion-dollar capital investment of a subway or light rail system?