3 ms·
It is an argument and it is not a straw man, because that argument is based on historical precedent. It's simply observing what has happened repeatedly in the p
by peoplewindow 9y ago
It is an argument and it is not a straw man, because that argument is based on historical precedent. It's simply observing what has happened repeatedly in the past and pointing out it'd likely happen again. There are no logical fallacies there - if you believe the future would be different to the past, despite implementing the same policies, it's on you to argue why.
- sitkack 9y agoI am not going to argue on the merits of unions based another union and industries separation of duties taken out of context. It is an argument killing trope, "look at the ridiculous separation of job responsibilities in the film unions!" OMG, What would happen if we took this to the extreme in tech? Imagine, in a world where one person types statements and another enters semicolons. If you can't solve this problem, unions are bad. It has no bearing on the validity of labor collectively bargaining for better conditions.