3 ms·
You are correct, you can either provide or a bot or take part as a human. My argument is that genuine dumbness of chatbots may not be replicable by by humans. T
by paraschopra 16y ago
You are correct, you can either provide or a bot or take part as a human. My argument is that genuine dumbness of chatbots may not be replicable by by humans. The whole logic of game is that the human who is able to emulate a bot wins, so if you are successfully being too dumb and go undetected as a human, you win!
I think I figure your point, and yes the basic assumption is that all bots should be semi-intelligent. The whole game will become uninteresting if every just says "ABC.ABC.". I think we need a caveat or eligibility criteria to take care of that.
- joe_the_user 16y agoAny game with such an eligibility criteria is pretty much unstable. Winning would come down to seeing how well you could skirt the criteria, since "dumb but not too dumb" is inherently fuzzy.
- jacquesm 16y agoYou got it :) Thanks, it sounds really interesting by the way, I hope that you follow through on it, I'll definitely participate (with a bot, that's the fun bit I think).
- paraschopra 16y agoYup, will definitely code a prototype and link up some open source chatbots. On the other hand, I think being a human participant will be the fun bit :)