3 ms·
Wow, totally disagree. Instant-persistent-on is a much better and more intuitive experience than old "Cancel, Apply, Ok" settings paradigms.
by msbarnett 9y ago
Wow, totally disagree. Instant-persistent-on is a much better and more intuitive experience than old "Cancel, Apply, Ok" settings paradigms.
- reitanqild 9y agoDisagree strongly. There exist good cases for instant persistence, like switching themes when you want to see the effect immediately before you decide. Other than that it's really nice to be able to cancel everything when you realize you've messed up.
- nextos 9y agoOh no, persistency is great. But the problem is how non-functional their implementation is. Say I write a user.js file with a few options. I can't have the typical dotfile model, where removing options from this file will lead to defaults on the next run. I need to unset them. Explicitly. Thus, using a dot file to set up Firefox (user.js) is incredibly clunky and people don't use this much.
- vesinisa 9y agoFirefox actually retains all the default values for the preferences, and bolds the ones that are set to non-default values.
- scott_karana 9y agoIf you could export the diff, or import settings, that would be adequate.