3 ms·
Because that decreases the supply of housing available for those that cannot afford secondary residencies. If there is not enough extra housing supply, you end
by dbmikus 9y ago
Because that decreases the supply of housing available for those that cannot afford secondary residencies. If there is not enough extra housing supply, you end up raising rent prices. If the market isn't creating enough housing for some reason or another, middle-class and lower-middle-class are left hung out to dry.
This dichotomy bleeds over into arguments about welfare state, supply-side economics vs high upper income taxes, etc. You can argue that people should be able to create value and earn however possible, but I'm going to disagree with that view. I think regulation and limits are appropriate in some cases, this being one of them.
- chii 9y agoThere's a lot of ifs in your statement. I don't necessarily think that raising real-estate prices is a bad thing. It will encourage building of more real-estate. Laws that precent so artificially should be abolished. Using regulation to prevent a private owner from exploiting his property to the maximum degree ought to only be reserved for matters of commons (such as environmental polution/degredation etc).