3 ms·
" The Board of Trustees of Social Security tells us that the program is going to completely run out of money within the next 15 years. " Is very misleading. S
by georgeecollins 9y ago
"
The Board of Trustees of Social Security tells us that the program is going to completely run out of money within the next 15 years. " Is very misleading. Social Security is not a bank account, it is an insurance (you can get it at any time, and you get it simply because you paid in) where people are constantly paying in and out.
In 17 years* the Social Security system will probably have to cut benefits by 23% unless we either raise the retirement rate or raise the maximum salary at which you have to pay social security tax. The latter is a pretty painless thing to the average tax payer, who already has all their salary subject to social security tax.
The social security system was in much greater danger in the Reagan era, when they decided to make benefits taxable, which was ultimately a progressive way to reduce benefits.
*http://money.cnn.com/2017/07/13/news/economy/social-security-trust-fund-projection/index.html http://money.cnn.com/2017/07/13/news/economy/social-security...
- TheSpiceIsLife 9y agoI don't understand why there is a max income threshold for social security tax. Can anyone explain this to me?
- mpwoz 9y agoPresumably because over a certain threshold, you're paying far more than you'd ever expect to receive back from the program in retirement? Not saying I agree with it but that's my guess as to the reason.
- mobilefriendly 9y agoIt was conceptualized as a universal safety net pension program, not a welfare program or progressive redistribution program.
- 0xffff2 9y agoI assume you actually mean "raise the retirement age"? Raising the retirement rate would mean paying out more money, not less.
- georgeecollins 9y agoRight sorry, raise the retirement age. Which is not good for people, but fits with the idea that people are living and working longer in general.