4 ms·
Oh god. I appreciate your comment, but something about this advice gets me. Is this sort of thing what _literacy_ is now...
by patcon 9y ago
Oh god. I appreciate your comment, but something about this advice gets me. Is this sort of thing what _literacy_ is now...
- cinquemb 9y agoYeah, I share the same sentiment. Learned a bit more about online ad bidding dynamics, but will continue to browse the internet with JS/cookies disabled by default as well as spoofing info on every request from user agents related to what api's are available with my custom build on a fork from firefox nightly.
- manicdee 9y agoSo you are attempting to evade tracking by being uniquely identifiable?
- cinquemb 9y agoThe information is "real" in that it is information that has been collected from a sampling of browsers of users from over the internet, or particular subset from local users connected to a nearby public network(s). As long as I'm not logging into something that would personally identify me, for all intents or purposes, I might as well be any number of the people around me connected to a network that I sampled. So even if I enabled javascript/cookies/etc, at worst I would be delivered a sampling of the ads the people around me (or the data that I sampled) were being sent. I'm also, not on facebook/instagram/twitter etc, so I avoid the downsides of the social media bubble all together. If I "need" to use such services, I'd just create a dummy account, and discard it after. It's not so much to evade tracking (although it can be effective in some instances), but to dirty the waters/avoid the feedback loop from tracking via ads delivered or the parasitic choices (or lack their of mostly) of others who just do nothing and jump head first into the next available skinner box. Not like it would be impossible for a nation state actor to move against me.