3 ms·
The point is that you don't need the added complexity of a worker pool. It's another thing to break, so why bother?
by regularfry 9y ago
The point is that you don't need the added complexity of a worker pool. It's another thing to break, so why bother?
- michaelmior 9y agoEven 250ms latency to boot is significant. Especially if you're processing thousands of requests per second.
- NegativeLatency 9y agoOr if you are processing more than 4 per core per second.
- imtringued 9y agoThreads take milliseconds to start yet we still use thread pools.