3 ms·

> simply integrating speed over time This probably runs into issues with accumulated error, especially if the error in speed measurement has a serial correlati

> simply integrating speed over time This probably runs into issues with accumulated error, especially if the error in speed measurement has a serial correlation.

DigitalJack 9y ago
That’s what sensor fusion is for. That said, inertial nav can take a plane across the country without correction and get within sight of the target. I think integrating actual speed while on rails would be vastly more accurate. And really, it just need to augment gps.
- sobellian 9y ago
  Sure, sensor fusion sounds reasonable. My mistake, I thought you were referring to GPS and speed integration as separate options.
- AstralStorm 9y ago
  Are you trying to reinvent already outdated ETCS level 2?
  - DigitalJack 9y ago
    I'm not inventing anything. And why would it be outdated if it works, and we (US) aren't using it.
rphlx 9y ago
> probably runs into issues with accumulated error Typically there's no single nor double integration required for a wheeled ground vehicle; distance (revolutions times wheel circumference) is the primary measurement, with speed being trivially computed from that plus an accurate clock.
- kd5bjo 9y ago
  That assumes there's insignificant slippage between the wheel and ground. A reasonable assumption for a rubber tire on a concrete road, with a 20 sq. in. contact patch. Less reasonable for steel on steel with a 2 sq. in. contact patch.
  - rphlx 9y ago
    I certainly agree that there are still errors, wheel slip being a major one. However, that does not cause an accumulating/ever-compounding error in speed nor distance travelled in the way that, say, a one-time error from an IMU's accelerometer does. The lack-of-integration common in wheeled ground vehicles is highly beneficial to long-term speed & distance accuracy; it's a main reason why odometers were accurate for literally thousands of years prior to anyone knowing how to build an equally-accurate aircraft/spacecraft IMU. (The Romans were able to achieve <0.5% errors over hundreds of miles by the first century AD, something that no aircraft IMU was consistently able to achieve until after WWII).

> simply integrating speed over time This probably runs into issues with accumulated error, especially if the error in speed measurement has a serial correlation.

DigitalJack 9y ago

That’s what sensor fusion is for. That said, inertial nav can take a plane across the country without correction and get within sight of the target. I think integrating actual speed while on rails would be vastly more accurate. And really, it just need to augment gps.

sobellian 9y ago
Sure, sensor fusion sounds reasonable. My mistake, I thought you were referring to GPS and speed integration as separate options.
AstralStorm 9y ago
Are you trying to reinvent already outdated ETCS level 2?
- DigitalJack 9y ago
  I'm not inventing anything. And why would it be outdated if it works, and we (US) aren't using it.

rphlx 9y ago

> probably runs into issues with accumulated error Typically there's no single nor double integration required for a wheeled ground vehicle; distance (revolutions times wheel circumference) is the primary measurement, with speed being trivially computed from that plus an accurate clock.

kd5bjo 9y ago
That assumes there's insignificant slippage between the wheel and ground. A reasonable assumption for a rubber tire on a concrete road, with a 20 sq. in. contact patch. Less reasonable for steel on steel with a 2 sq. in. contact patch.
- rphlx 9y ago
  I certainly agree that there are still errors, wheel slip being a major one. However, that does not cause an accumulating/ever-compounding error in speed nor distance travelled in the way that, say, a one-time error from an IMU's accelerometer does. The lack-of-integration common in wheeled ground vehicles is highly beneficial to long-term speed & distance accuracy; it's a main reason why odometers were accurate for literally thousands of years prior to anyone knowing how to build an equally-accurate aircraft/spacecraft IMU. (The Romans were able to achieve <0.5% errors over hundreds of miles by the first century AD, something that no aircraft IMU was consistently able to achieve until after WWII).