3 ms·
I started trying Vivaldi a while back, mainly due to performance issues. It's missing some of the features I've grown to like about Firefox and has some additio
by djsumdog 9y ago
I started trying Vivaldi a while back, mainly due to performance issues. It's missing some of the features I've grown to like about Firefox and has some additional bugs, but overall it's considerably faster.
- skrebbel 9y agoFaster than Quantum?
- ReverseCold 9y agoVivaldi is Chromium but without google, a ton of cool power user features, and closed source. It's fast if Chrome is fast.
- skrebbel 9y agoI get that, but I'm surprised that anyone would call Chrome or any of its derivatives "considerably faster" than Firefox >= 57
- pbhjpbhj 9y agoSomehow I'm not getting much improvement in speed with 57, it's been a bad transition technically for me too, aside from the privacy/marketing - lost addons (expected, but still), broken fonts, bookmarks not working, one users profile completely broken (other ones on same computer are fine), slow page load, lots of freezes, ... reversing the changes to the newtabpage and such. Worst update in ages for me, only one as bad was one of the teens (19.0?) which needed new profiles making. I've only been using it since v0.6 or so though ^_^