3 ms·
The trouble with this is that it boils down to "we don't have conclusive evidence that it isn't dangerous". And that can be applied to anything. You talk vagu
by adrianratnapala 9y ago
The trouble with this is that it boils down to "we don't have conclusive evidence that it isn't dangerous". And that can be applied to anything.
You talk vaguely about plausible mechanisms in the plural, but the only one you can name is heating -- which is tiny. We should certainly ban hair dryer and centrally heated shops before we worry about phones.
- dekhn 9y agoThat is why I am waiting for strong epidemiological evidence, before suggesting we actually pursue the physical mechanism. I think most of the reporting around cell phones is needlessly alarmist. It's not helped by a number of scientists who persist in running low-quality studies and producing vague, unactionable results, coupled with lots of PR.