3 ms·
Here's some evidence re: non-ionizing radiation and tumors: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/major-cell-phone-radiation-study-reignites-cancer-questi
by makmanalp 9y ago
Here's some evidence re: non-ionizing radiation and tumors:
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/major-cell-phone-radiation-study-reignites-cancer-questions/ https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/major-cell-phone-...
> The fact that scientists were able to expose animals to nonionizing radiation (like that emitted by cell phones) and those animals went on to develop tumors but that exposure did not significantly raise the animals' body temperatures was “important” to release, Bucher says.
Actual site: https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/results/areas/cellphones/ https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/results/areas/cellphones/
- dekhn 9y agoMy one comment as a biologist is that the biology community calls the rats they used in that study (Sprague Dawley) should be called "cancer rats", because they seem predisposed to getting cancer no matter what you give them. It's not clear to me whether this is humor, or not.
- valuearb 9y agoNot statistically significant.