4 ms·
> Even upon receiving that, many people would still work massive hours to obtain the best house on the block. I'm no UBI expert, but I don't think you understa
by MadcapJake 9y ago
> Even upon receiving that, many people would still work massive hours to obtain the best house on the block.
I'm no UBI expert, but I don't think you understand the point of UBI: universal basic income. I would argue (again no expert here) it's more about constant economic injection, providing a baseline to reduce risk of entrepreneurship and generally providing a higher quality of life to the 99%'ers.
As far as paying for it or finding the right way to make it happen in the US, I agree that there are a ton of roadblocks. Right now welfare is at $1.3 trillion, let's say that was increased to $2 trillion; divide by 300 million Americans and you've got over $6,500 per American per year. Just over half of what you stated is the typical amount discussed. That being said, I could certainly find a good use for an extra $500+ a month in income.
> How exactly do you convince a nation which already isn't willing to pay for healthcare to pay for basic income, too?
I think it's the politicians and the news media that twists this, Americans in polls generally do support single-payer health care and I would posit this same sentiment would be shared for basic income (if not more support since it's quite a bit easier to understand)
- pault 9y agoSure, but you are advocating redistribution of wealth from the most impoverished segment of the population to the middle and upper classes. I’m not sure how helpful that would be. I mean, I would love to buy more toys every month but is that worth taking away someone else’s food stamps and healthcare?
- Dylan16807 9y agoI assure you that the upper classes will have their taxes increase by more than the UBI amount.