12 ms·
"Backward compatibility" is holding back creativity a fair bit, I would think. You can build two completely different cathedrals, both surviving the ages. But s
by roblabla 9y ago
"Backward compatibility" is holding back creativity a fair bit, I would think. You can build two completely different cathedrals, both surviving the ages. But straying from the fork/exec pattern would make you completely incompatible with the current software landscape, and leave you with no users, and no lasting impact, no matter how "elegant" your solution is.
- api 9y agoAs long as you are able to support that pattern, a thin emulation layer would let you run Unix software.