4 ms·
If you urgently want Apple to fix something, you do not file quiet bug reports. Apple only responds reliably to PR storms. This vulnerability is ridiculous, un
by bangonkeyboard 9y ago
If you urgently want Apple to fix something, you do not file quiet bug reports. Apple only responds reliably to PR storms.
This vulnerability is ridiculous, unacceptable, and braindead to execute.
- Scoundreller 9y agoWe need to come up with a witty name to get it fixed faster.
- bhhaskin 9y agoAppleGate
- neverartful 9y agoi0wned
- maephisto 9y agoiRoot. uRoot. Everybody Root.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- plttn 9y agoMy current favorite is I am Root.
- Rexxar 9y agoiAmroot to respect the brand policy.
- saagarjha 9y agoYou can go about it both ways: file a bug report, put a reasonable date that you want them to fix it by. Then you can disclose it.
- patcheudor 9y agoThis happens quite often. Report a bug to Apple through CERT as an example and they run with a well known 45 day disclosure timeline. For researchers who don't want to get into vendor conflicts this is a good path because CERT ultimately holds the decision.
- patcheudor 9y ago> Apple only responds reliably to PR storms They've been quick (within 45 days) to patch every major bug I've reported to them and where the bugs were cross platform, impacting Windows, Android, etc., they've consistently been amongst the quickest to issue a patch so I'm not sure how you qualify that statement.
- bangonkeyboard 9y agoI qualified it with "reliably". Major bugs reported by you, a security researcher, may be bucketed differently than those deemed less serious or filed by others. As a recent example, a minor bug like the iOS 11 calculator ignoring keypresses had reports filed since Beta 1, but only after it made headlines and caused Apple public embarrassment will it be addressed in the upcoming 11.2, six months later.
- tytso 9y agoSorry. 45 days is not quick.