5 ms·
Alternatively, Google says "net neutrality is is great for everybody else, bitches." "Don't be evil" is officially dead at the hands of a lust for control. Com
by hansef 16y ago
Alternatively, Google says "net neutrality is is great for everybody else, bitches."
"Don't be evil" is officially dead at the hands of a lust for control. Compare to Google in 2006:
"Today the Internet is an information highway where anybody – no matter how large or small, how traditional or unconventional – has equal access. But the phone and cable monopolies, who control almost all Internet access, want the power to choose who gets access to high-speed lanes and whose content gets seen first and fastest. They want to build a two-tiered system and block the on-ramps for those who can't pay. Creativity, innovation and a free and open marketplace are all at stake in this fight." -- Eric Schmidt
http://www.google.com/help/netneutrality_letter.html http://www.google.com/help/netneutrality_letter.html
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]
- alf 16y agoThis article a little hard to believe to me. It's unsettling to see it from the NYT. Is there a need to bring up Android twice? I fail see to how Verizon running Android phones strengthens the notion that these two companies are forming an alliance. This would go against everything Google has publicly stated on the subject.
- mikedouglas 16y agoGoogle has supported net neutrality legislation, but I don't think they've ever ruled out playing along with the carriers, had the regulatory efforts failed. I'm not so sure what is so hard to believe; fast response times are crucial to Google's core business, selling eyeballs to advertisers. They could have waited for Microsoft or Yahoo to make the first move, but it's possible they were worried about being shut out.
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]
- jsz0 16y agoAllow me to paint a conspiracy theory: Verizon: So yeah Google... Apple is interested in making a deal to prioritize iTunes traffic with us. We figured we'd see if you wanted to make a deal too. Google: No way. Verizon: OK well, bad news, we're not going to subsidize Android phones anymore. We're never touching Google TV for FIOS. We're going to start selling the iPhone in fact -- and Apple has even let us change the default search engine to Bing as part of our prioritization deal. Google: Well played. Where do we sign up?
- refulgentis 16y agoThat's not a conspiracy theory, that's completely making shit up. Apple doesn't appear once in the entire article.
- nostrademons 16y ago"That's not a conspiracy theory, that's completely making shit up." Aren't they usually the same thing?
- jsz0 16y agoDefinitely. It's just interesting to think about the possibilities. Things always happen for a reason. Maybe I should have added a disclaimer that it's complete speculation. If Google had made this type of deal with Comcast or Cox Communications there wouldn't be any room for wacky conspiracy theories because they have very little direct interest in any Google services or products. Verizon does. That's what makes it fun.
- loewenskind 16y ago>This would go against everything Google has publicly stated on the subject. Who cares what a company has publicly stated? If a US insurance company has always publicly stated they only care about saving lives would you believe them? I guess so.
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]
- hartror 16y agoAs opposed to now :( http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/search/label/Net%20Neutrality http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/search/label/Net%20Ne...