5 ms·
Sure, and why shouldn't he?
by creaghpatr 9y ago
Sure, and why shouldn't he?
- i_cant_speel 9y agoThere's nothing inherently wrong with working at a telco after his tenure. What's wrong is he is making decisions at the expense of the American people to secure that position.
- throwawaymanbot 9y agoBecause... you are less likely to bite the hand that feeds you??? Are you for real?
- nindalf 9y agoBecause accepting a job at a firm immediately after shifting government rules in its favour is corruption. Its absurd to claim that the government work was impartial when so many regulators end up taking advantage of the revolving door between government and industry.
- ghrifter 9y agoOk, so you lose your job due to your commission expiring, or you get replaced by a new administration. but you cant be a lobbyist so what do you work for? other goverment jobs, or back to the private sector. what if we had a google exec become some internet government position, then went back to google? would there be this public outcry?
- aeontech 9y agoOf course there would be a public outcry if during his government appointment he worked to weaken or dismiss regulation that impacts Google directly. It’s the textbook definition of conflict of interest.
- rhino369 9y agoIt's only corruption if there is some sort of quid pro quo. If I were telecom lawyer, I'd rather Title II to be honest. Creates more work.
- criddell 9y agoNow you're confusing me.