4 ms·
Well, I don't blame them for promoting their product. Speed, however, is probably among the least important things when it comes to incognito mode. I would have
by cJ0th 9y ago
Well, I don't blame them for promoting their product. Speed, however, is probably among the least important things when it comes to incognito mode. I would have appreciated it if they had spent more time figuring out how to reduce fingerprints.
- callahad 9y agoWe are. It's not quite polished yet, but check out privacy.resistFingerprinting (and privacy.firstparty.isolate) in about:config. This all dovetails with our work to upstream the relevant patches from the Tor Browser Bundle, which is also proceeding apace. More info at https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Fingerprinting https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Fingerprinting
- cJ0th 9y agoThat's great to hear :)
- Dylan16807 9y ago> privacy.resistFingerprinting Is there a reason that setting does so many different things? I've been trying it for a few days but it's a real problem when I want some of those settings but not others. For example the protection against canvas image extraction needs work. It's stuck on 'ask' with constant popups, and once you pick yes/no on a domain it's impossible to see the permission or change it ever again. Until it forgets on browser restart and starts bugging you all over again.
- daxorid 9y agoThe privacy afforded by anti-fingerprinting features is kind of useless as long as the browser remains a member of the UAF-vuln-of-the-week club.