3 ms·
And that's with incompetence and neglect. http://chernobylgallery.com/chernobyl-disaster/cause/ http://chernobylgallery.com/chernobyl-disaster/cause/ Personne
by adekok 9y ago
And that's with incompetence and neglect.
http://chernobylgallery.com/chernobyl-disaster/cause/ http://chernobylgallery.com/chernobyl-disaster/cause/
Personnel had an insufficiently detailed understanding of technical procedures involved with the nuclear reactor, and knowingly ignored regulations to speed test completion
And a Japanese reactor that didn't melt down:
https://thebulletin.org/onagawa-japanese-nuclear-power-plant-didn%E2%80%99t-melt-down-311 https://thebulletin.org/onagawa-japanese-nuclear-power-plant...
Before beginning construction, Tohoku Electric conducted surveys and simulations aimed at predicting tsunami levels. The initial predictions showed that tsunamis in the region historically had an average height of about 3 meters. Based on that, the company constructed its plant at 14.7 meters above sea level, almost five times that height. As more research was done, the estimated tsunami levels climbed higher, and Tohoku Electric conducted periodic checkups based on the new estimate.
There's just no good reason for either Chernobyl or Fukushima. Both were preventable by following simple safety procedures.
- lovemenot 9y ago>> And that's with incompetence and neglect. Yes, and rightly so. Engineers must design around human fallibility. They don't get to blame human error and claim the whole system is otherwise perfectly safe. Either the system is safe under conditions of human fallibility, or it is unsafe. >> There's just no good reason for either Chernobyl or Fukushima Of course there is reason. Humans are part of the system and a relatively weak part at that.
- smallnamespace 9y agoHow do engineers design around the propensity of politicians to kick the can down the road?
- imtringued 9y agoThat is the fundamental problem with nuclear power. You can trust the technology but you can't trust the humans.