I seem to recall the designer of ascii stating that it was a mistake, and they should've gone with prefix coding instead (following-is-capital,a->A;following is

I seem to recall the designer of ascii stating that it was a mistake, and they should've gone with prefix coding instead (following-is-capital,a->A;following is number,<byte>->67 or something along those lines - basically escape codes for everything, I suppose). Instead we got ascii evolved to really, really, really big ascii (utf-32, and the variable encoding utf-8). But yeah, having a "next-is-superscript"-token would probably be cleaner than individual code points for every little glyph that might be a superscript...