5 ms·
I get the counter argument. I simply disagree with it. Or more, I disagree with the way it’s put. As a share holder, I’m more than happy with the status quo. A
by sbuk 9y ago
I get the counter argument. I simply disagree with it. Or more, I disagree with the way it’s put. As a share holder, I’m more than happy with the status quo. A business or individual should be expected to pay what they don’t have too. That would be charitable donation, which is ironically tax deductible! I disagree with the richeously indignant who suggest otherwise...
- wolco 9y agoAs a shareholder I question the waste of money on this vanity hq.
- scott_karana 9y agoHuh? I was only talking about how it's disingenuous to talk about being the "biggest tax payer" when their effective rate still might be lower than what they "should have to pay" because of their complex accounting strategies. Not about progressive tax rates, which your comment seems to be about?