3 ms·
One reason I could see is if upgrading in place is substantially faster or cheaper than migrating data to new ones. For instance, if the nodes are storage node
by lambda 9y ago
One reason I could see is if upgrading in place is substantially faster or cheaper than migrating data to new ones.
For instance, if the nodes are storage nodes in a redundant storage system, taking each one offline briefly for a reboot, and letting the others handle the slightly higher load, is a lot quicker than spinning up a new node and replicating all of the data over there so you can de-provision the old one.
Also, even if they don't have a lot of data, the time and resulting expense of spinning up and provisioning a new node while the old one is still online could add up to higher costs than just performing a reboot during a point of lower load.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]