3 ms·
Well, considering $1 spent on a US election by a foreign power is illegal the comparative ad buys of the campaigns themselves aren't relevant. Also, the 0.1MM e
by daveguy 9y ago
Well, considering $1 spent on a US election by a foreign power is illegal the comparative ad buys of the campaigns themselves aren't relevant. Also, the 0.1MM estimate from Facebook is a severe underestimate. Twitter id'ed ~20x that.
- adventured 9y agoThere's also nothing new about that. The 1996 Clinton Campaign broke the law by illegally taking piles of foreign Chinese money. The foreign money scandals have followed the Clintons for decades, which has seen several of the money runners arrested. Naturally nobody on the left has ever cared about any of that.