5 ms·
RR count | length ---------+-------- 107 | 131 (1024-bit with exponent 65337 == 3*29*751) What the hell? I can imagine the occasional per
by cperciva 9y ago
RR count | length
---------+--------
107 | 131 (1024-bit with exponent 65337 == 3*29*751)
What the hell? I can imagine the occasional person typing 65337 when they mean 65537, but 107 such records?
- jlgaddis 9y ago> 65337 You mean 65535? :-)
- _jal 9y agoEvil!
- justinjlynn 9y ago!livE
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- ryan-c 9y agoIn my scan of the alexa top 1m domains in Aug 2013, there were 10 domains using 65337 and 54 domains using 65535. I suspect someone wrote bad instructions.
- taspeotis 9y ago"About 1,490 results" https://www.google.com.au/search?q=65337+exponent https://www.google.com.au/search?q=65337+exponent Although mind that some results have 65537 in them, too.
- SmallDeadGuy 9y ago107 wrong and 6.2 million correct seems like a pretty low fraction to me.
- jandrese 9y agoA typo involving a wrongly doubled number next to a wrongly not doubled number in the interior of the number seems like a very human error. Seeing it happen in 0.0017% of the cases doesn't seem all that hard to believe. I've processed human input, nothing surprises me anymore.