3 ms·

What do you think the solution would be, should this take off? Wrapping early stage trials in a veil of secrecy?

• ImSkeptical 9y ago
  I'd say we should encourage this, but just make sure our intellectual property agreements are strong enough so that both parties benefit from their contribution. In my view, we need to be moving much faster on developing technologies, drugs, and therapies. If some societies are able to help out, we should be grateful and welcome that - so long as the subjects all consent.
  • amelius 9y ago
    So basically you would applaud weaker ethical rules in China?
    • jimmies 9y ago
      There is no doubt that China has weaker ethical rules compared to the West, but I think in this case, as long as the person consents, what's the problem? Do you necessarily think that it's more ethical to have laws or rules that forbids suicides or self-harm regardless of what a person wants?
    • ImSkeptical 9y ago
      Making a choice to protect people trying new treatments keeps those people safer but the trade-off is that you develop new treatments slower, which means more people suffer and die waiting for treatments. Developing quickly versus safely are different decisions, but I don't think one is purely stronger or weaker than the other.