3 ms·
She doesn't make much of an argument for why this product is bad, just expects us to follow along with her moral outrage.
by audleman 9y ago
She doesn't make much of an argument for why this product is bad, just expects us to follow along with her moral outrage.
- choward 9y agoI agree. This article has no substance. What does this have to do with Juicero? Amazon is trying to solve the problem of not being home when someone attempts to deliver a package. She didn't even attempt to provide an alternative solution to the problem. She just claimed that it's dumb idea because some people like interacting with people. Sure, that's fine. But I just bypassed a store to order something online and not interact with people. Why would I have the desire to interact with my delivery driver? I wouldn't. I just want my package delivered.
- joezydeco 9y agoI just want my package delivered ...and not stolen off your doorstep. Happens in every neighborhood. Amazon's tape and labeling all over the box isn't helping things, but that's another issue.
- d0lph 9y agoYou could tell it was just a rant from the first sentence: > Amazon wants to let strangers into your house and train a surveillance camera on your front door. Oh, and they’d like you to pay them $250 for the privilege. For one, they aren't strangers, they are postal office employees, and of course they are not giving out a door lock and camera for free.