2 ms·
I believe such public relation campaigns are much broader and are aimed at emotions more than facts. Please take a look, a look at how silly our enemy is. edi
by the-dude 9y ago
I believe such public relation campaigns are much broader and are aimed at emotions more than facts.
Please take a look, a look at how silly our enemy is.
edit: a bit like a (PG) submarine
- adventured 9y agoI certainly understand the PR wars that nations fight, whether the US / Britain / Russia / China / et al. I don't see how that relates to US accusations of Russian aggression and the quality of the Tu-144 that the BBC article is discussing. For example, you haven't refuted anything about what the article actually says regarding the plane's deficiencies. If one were to follow your premise here to its logical conclusion, it would lead to this: you can never negatively critique anything created by the Soviet Union, or you're working for the US in a PR war against modern Russia.