4 ms·
Right. You just need an actor to stand in pictures for consistant facial recognition. Occasionally send overlapping data (typing a message at one place, while w
by e12e 9y ago
Right. You just need an actor to stand in pictures for consistant facial recognition. Occasionally send overlapping data (typing a message at one place, while writing a status in another) - all in consistent and different styles.
Possible? Maybe. Easy? No.
- mirimir 9y agoWhy do you need to have a face? You certainly don't use smartphones (or any device with a camera or microphone) with your alternate personas. I occasionally want a photo, but I just find something fun online. And about style. Mirimir only writes in English. I draw on my experience working with Americans, including many from the South. My meatspace identity never uses English online.
- Chaebixi 9y agoI just tagged myself in a bunch of stock photos (with the same few models) to foil the algorithms. Haven't tested the effects since I've long disabled facial-recognition tagging in my profile, though. I suppose someday they might implement features to try to detect and filter out that kind of thing, but then it will time to abandon the platform totally.
- e12e 9y agoThere's no need for a data hoarder to rely on platform specific facial recognition - they'll presumably ingest all photos and tag/group them themselves. This of course includes images where you've been photographed in a group/public place. I imagine it's pretty trivial to "walk" from a single known-good photo (eg: booking / surveillance photo taken in connection to a "suspicious" public gathering, atm cctv, or where a person is figuring in the same photo as a known "person of interest") - to ~99.9% of all photos in the dataset...