4 ms·
A bit of headline fail there: "Introducing Surface Book 2, the most powerful Surface Book ever" Out of the two of them so far?
by trothamel 9y ago
A bit of headline fail there:
"Introducing Surface Book 2, the most powerful Surface Book ever"
Out of the two of them so far?
- Rhapso 9y agoNo it is a prophecy: The rest of them will be less powerful.
- matthew349hall 9y agoHaha yes
- dandare 9y agoThank you Apple for introducing this meaningless phrase to humanity's discourse.
- rob74 9y agoThey talk the Apple talk, but can they walk the Apple walk? ;)
- jamesrcole 9y agoIt's not meaningless. There's two reasons. Improvements along a particular dimension aren't always a given. If they said "Introducing the Apple iPhone 8 Plus, the lightest iPhone ever" they'd be lying. You can't assume that a newer model of something is always going to be more powerful. Language isn't purely literal. Especially when there's a limited number of words to market to people. You can't write a 10 000 essay. So mentioning a detail isn't just to communicate the literal facts, it's to highlight details, point out significant details. So when someone says "it's the most X ever" they are saying that the improvements are significant enough to make them notable.
- reboog711 9y agoTechnically, 3 of them because they had a mini-refresh of the "Surface Book with Performance Base" around 1 year after the initial release.
- seanmcdirmid 9y agoWho wants to wager that the Surface Book 3 won't be even more powerful than the Surface Book 2?
- disconnected 9y agoI'll wait for Surface Book 3.11 for Workgroups.
- MikusR 9y agoThat's how Apple does it.
- PKop 9y agoI think they had enough sense to wait more than 2 generations to say it though.
- jermaustin1 9y agoEither way, would you ever release a new version that wasn't as {positive adjective here}?
- santoshalper 9y agoI noticed that too... "Hasn't there been only one other, and wasn't it over a year ago? I would hope so."
- mamon 9y agoIf they said "Most powerful LAPTOP ever" that could bring some legal issues on them. In EU there's a law that forbids using such an unsubstantiated/unverifiable/subjective claim in the advertisements. EDIT: Recalled one more detail: If you use a claim like that in the commercial then EU regulatory institutions can demand an actual peer reviewed research paper backing it up :)