8 ms·
Ah, but this is the light side of information. We keep uncovering these 1000 people, and the next 1000, until they realise there is nowhere to hide and their ac
by hd4 9y ago
Ah, but this is the light side of information. We keep uncovering these 1000 people, and the next 1000, until they realise there is nowhere to hide and their activities will become public knowledge. This is what they're scared of, after all. That they lose the ability to operate normally in public.
- coldtea 9y ago>We keep uncovering these 1000 people, and the next 1000, until they realise there is nowhere to hide and their activities will become public knowledge. That's charming.
- thriftwy 9y agoThat's doable. Never underestimate the power of metodical work. People have great appreciation of "it was a wonderful little scheme but it doesn't work nowdays". What's really charming to them is your cynicism, it's what they invested in.
- coldtea 9y ago>Never underestimate the power of metodical work. Never underestimate several milenia of human history. >What's really charming to them is your cynicism, it's what they invested in. If only.
- thriftwy 9y agoIf anything several millenia of human history has taught us, is that it's possible to enforce laws that govern the society. And that if society is no longer governed by laws, it quickly falls apart. Indeed, societal failure is no stranger in a course of history than beehive colony failure.
- yb7721 9y agoEnforce against Joe citizen. The government, the bureaucracy and big money have always been above the law. But of course you are welcome to continue the work of Caruana Galizia.
- 19182312 9y agoWe?
- erikb 9y agoYes each of them is worried about losing here. But the system is the system. That is what "next" means. You discover a few, but it doesn't change the system.
- marcosdumay 9y agoThe system won't change if the guilty stay in charge. Here is how you change a system: 1 - you replace the people in charge; 2 - if the new people don't change it, you go back to item 1.
- erikb 9y agoWho replaces the people in charge? Who takes care of the people in charge not getting corrupt themselves? Who takes care that the most logical action for a leader is not a corrupt one? It's simply not possible. And look through history. We already went through many systems and in all faced this same issue. The people in charge where replaced multiple times already, because the previous generation died. And it's not always the blood related children who pick up the crown either.
- marcosdumay 9y ago> Who replaces the people in charge? People somehow pressure them out. It is always messy and specific, so, it's pointless to ask for generalities. > Who takes care of the people in charge not getting corrupt themselves? Nobody. You follow the steps. > Who takes care that the most logical action for a leader is not a corrupt one? I don't understand this question. Anyway, if you take a look at history, you will see that the only thing that ever solved a rotten top are those steps I outlined. Waiting for the old people to die off is a way of doing it, but quite slow and unbiased; it works much better with societal pressures biasing it towards keeping the more honest people.
- erikb 9y ago> People somehow pressure them out. It is always messy and specific, so, it's pointless to ask for generalities. lol. then give an example. If my argumentation is true this should basically never happen.
- ImSkeptical 9y agoWhat if they keep murdering the people who discover them, then people stop discovering them?