3 ms·
It can be tied to insurance so it doesn't have to be exactly govt mandated.
by pvdebbe 9y ago
It can be tied to insurance so it doesn't have to be exactly govt mandated.
- krageon 9y agoThat's an even worse idea. You've shifted all of the data from the agency at least tangentially concerned with people's welfare to a corporation only concerned with profit.
- pvdebbe 9y agoI don't think the cameras have to be network connected. Have the video feed locally only and for insurance claims you have to provide the relevant bit of video that will help determine the culprit. Like the Russians do.
- labster 9y agoI doubleplusagree that we should have at least the level of security measures as in Eurasia.
- Piskvorrr 9y agoThat was not the point. Why do you think the Russians do this? Because the insurance co would deny any coverage by default ("meh, must have been your fault anyway, now f* off"), and no recourse. Yeah, that's definitely a worthy goal to aim for.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]