3 ms·
My comment is a bit pithy, but the time to think about that has passed. There are many fine suggestions in the thread, so I'm going to amend, assuming you don'
by KGIII 9y ago
My comment is a bit pithy, but the time to think about that has passed.
There are many fine suggestions in the thread, so I'm going to amend, assuming you don't mind, your statement - just a little.
"It's time for everyone else to think about their fire plan."
At this point, OP should just follow the best solutions posted in the thread that the situation safely allows for. I'd add that they should monitor local radio as that's likely the source of a rapid evacuation notice.
-
Edited to make it clear that my comment is the pithy one, not the one to which I am responding.
- gerdesj 9y agoYes, I suddenly realised that the OP is not worrying about the basics but a clear and present danger (see my EDIT2) I'm not from around there ...
- KGIII 9y agoLOL I think we might both be editing our comments in real time. As it appears to be a real and present danger, I'm tempted to write about how to respond in an emergency situation. I'd be more concerned with it derailing the subject of the thread, however. I'd also add that if there is real risk, moving before the traffic increase may be a wise option. I'm not able to determine their risk and, for liability reasons, would not do so.
- Dylan16807 9y agoI completely understand taking the opportunity to give basic fire advice. But I have to know: what did you think the "next 24 hours" part was for?