>I'm not sure that the results should be intuitive. This is an appeal to complexity fallacy. A result may initially be counterintuitive, but it is the the dut

>I'm not sure that the results should be intuitive. This is an appeal to complexity fallacy. A result may initially be counterintuitive, but it is the the duty of the experimenter to alter their model to fit the new data. To explain the results in terms of known phenomenon and develop a new intuition which includes the unexpected results in the model. If you are having trouble fitting a result into your current intuition, it is because your intuition is an using outdated or improper model of the phenomenon. Nobody is born with intuition. It is learned, via bayesian style updates of information to model reality. The more effort we put into quality updates of our intuitive model, the better our intuition of reality becomes.