4 ms·
The Evolution of Web Design
- troels 16y agoGood idea. The execution lacks quite a bit though.
- Jach 16y agoI didn't mind the execution so much, as I did something similar a couple years ago, but it was rushed and for an assignment anyway so it was actually not as cool as this. (For the craptacular "Web 0.5" webpage I used this as a repeated background: http://i659.photobucket.com/albums/uu319/itsyoshitime/fireWorkingAnimation.gif http://i659.photobucket.com/albums/uu319/itsyoshitime/fireWo... ) One thing it doesn't have though is the evolution to web applications.
- troels 16y agoHere's a similar attempt: http://psd.tutsplus.com/tutorials/interface-tutorials/five-looks-one-layout-how-to-develop-a-library-of-web-design-styles-at-your-fingertips/ http://psd.tutsplus.com/tutorials/interface-tutorials/five-l...
- pbhjpbhj 16y agoThat's more current styles though, I like it.
- troels 16y agoSo do I. It would be cool with a more complete "catalogue" of common styles, to have to compare between. I know there is an infinite number of classifications, but there's a lot of commonly seen themes, that could be turned into a taxonomy of sorts. Sort of a "design patterns" catalogue of web design. Maybe it exists already?
- loup-vaillant 16y agoNo standard alternate style sheets. Again.
- drivebyacct2 16y agoThe Web2.0 style looks more like a frontpage scheme. It's not even a good attempt to look web2.0-y. Most of the stylesheets are just poor executions of various styles that are even still in use in many places... I don't know if this was supposed to be a sarcastic or academic look at web design but I think it falls short on both accounts.