4 ms·
I'm genuinely interested in knowing how apple can tell that FaceID is better than TouchID - TouchID is already very fast - I can give access to someone else w
by Manozco 9y ago
I'm genuinely interested in knowing how apple can tell that FaceID is better than TouchID
- TouchID is already very fast
- I can give access to someone else with TouchID without giving my password
- It's unlikely that someone will be able to unlock my phone without me knowing it when using TouchID
- In case of coercion, I still have the possibility to give the wrong fingerprint 9 times before the good one
- I have to voluntary give my agreement with TouchID for an action (think apple pay)
All of that makes me think that they are trying to sell a feature that is only due to their engineering team unable to put TouchID on the Iphone X.
By every real world metrics, TouchID is better in my opinion...
- epicide 9y agoI think FaceID won't be as good, either, but Apple has surprised me before (with TouchID, no less). The iPhone X definitely seems to be the experimental phone, which I'm glad to see. I hope they continue the product lines they currently have for the phone: the experimental expensive one, the "normal" and Plus iterative ones, and the not-as-fancy-but-fits-in-my-small-hands one.
- jonknee 9y ago> It's unlikely that someone will be able to unlock my phone without me knowing it when using TouchID Do you really think it's likely that someone will steal your phone and then trick you into looking at your own phone without you realizing it? At that point you might as well be tricked into putting your finger on a TouchID sensor.
- remarkEon 9y agoI wonder...would it be possible to 3D print someone's likeness so as to spoof the FaceID?
- irq 9y agoYou would also have to make the 3D print mimic the same infrared emission patterns as the original person’s.
- Manozco 9y agoWell it's definitely possible to have me looking my phone held by someone else. And it's then too late...
- valuearb 9y agoYea, it’s possible a thief would be so brazen as to return to the scene of the crime and show you your stolen phone just to unlock it (instead of just assaulting you till you unlocked it). Who are you worried about, the Mission Impssibke team?
- hk__2 9y ago> they are trying to sell a feature that is only due to their engineering team unable to put TouchID on the Iphone X I highly doubt it’s easier to add FaceID than TouchID to any phone.
- Manozco 9y agoI remember reading some articles about the difficulty to have a fingerprint sensor under a screen, it might well have been easier to have FaceID (easier does not mean easy)
- dlubarov 9y agoThey could have put the fingerprint sensor on the back, as several Android phones do.
- X86BSD 9y agoAnd they could also install a hardware keyboard. Neither of which is going to happen. Just because you can do something doesn't mean you should.
- mtgx 9y agoFingerprint reader on the back is unobtrusive and quite an intuitive way to unlock a phone. I can hardly find any issue or "major compromise" with it. A physical keyboard on the other hand makes a phone at least twice as thick, twice as heavy, and twice as ugly (although the last one is more subjective).
- culturestate 9y agoIf I had a dollar for every time I watched someone turn their Android phone around to look for the fingerprint sensor on the back, I would have a lot more free time to post on HN.
- jacobolus 9y ago
- ehsankia 9y agoIt doesn't matter what Apple knows is true, they will say FaceID is better because why would they ever say that this new feature replacing the old one is worse? They can also present the facts in a misleading way that makes FaceID seem better. At the end of the day, you can never truly trust the company to present a fair review of their own device, and that's why reviewers exist.
- bsenftner 9y agoIt's a competitive move; it gives Apple and their users a bragging point, causing competition an expensive countermove. Competition has to move to depth sensor cameras and more on their phones, while Apple is reducing the expense and improving the quality of theirs. The Face ID tech is immature today, but a quarter or three? The quarter after that once support issues have had a few cycles, and the Face ID team has iterated, refactored and refreshed... This is a basic tech deployment they'll only improve. The real question to me, a person in the FR industry, will Apple iterate their camera hardware and extend the perception depth range to be competitive in the larger FR surveillance industry? The general FR industry has to recognize multiple people at a distance, and then IoT-like control other hardware, a game Apple is not touching with Face ID - yet.
- admiralpumpkin 9y ago- More secure (Face ID uses more data points) - Less user-interaction to authenticate (though as you point out this is also a negative) - Allows for other UX improvements, e.g., maintaining screen lighting while phone is being observed but not manipulated - My speculation: capacity to add additional faces will be added with SW (or next HW) update __ I don't understand your point #3. How do you think someone would unlock your phone with Face ID?
- Jeremy1026 9y agoFor their Point #3 I'm guessing they are saying if they are sleeping or a mugger points their phone at their face. Fortunately, Face ID has focus detection, so if you aren't looking at it then it won't unlock. Which makes point #3 moot as well.
- kennysmoothx 9y agoApple has mitigated this, your eyes need to be open and looking at the screen to be unlocked. It requires your face + your attention.
- rimliu 9y agoOne common scenario where I often have problems with TouchID and FaceID should solve them: wet hands.
- misterdata 9y agoThat, and gloves!
- skygazer 9y agoI just train my wet and dry prints separately, as separate fingers. If you promise no to tell any would be thief/gov about the backdoor into my phone, I’ve done the same for my capacitive glove finger.