I wonder why there would not be some kind of alternative economic opportunities in that city. I sense it would be the ideal place to "start over" and build som

I wonder why there would not be some kind of alternative economic opportunities in that city. I sense it would be the ideal place to "start over" and build something new in terms of politics and economics. But when you think about it, a city is such a complex thing, so unless there is money and investment, a poor american city will just stay poor, that seems to fit the law of gravity. Unless you redefine some new way to live in detroit that shortcuts the problems of money, this city will linger. It's surprising because I really think all the large pool of cash from the silicon valley and its thousands of new alternative ideas could revive detroit. But instead San Francisco is just the antithesis of detroit. That says lengths about the polarized world of today's capitalism. To be totally honest, I wonder why somebody like Bernie Sanders is not campaigning for mayor or governor other there. It's the ideal place for the left to accomplish things.