4 ms·
The problem with this is it's essentially a conspiracy theory. To be sure, internet shills exist. But it's punting, and intellectually lazy, to simply dismiss
by judah 9y ago
The problem with this is it's essentially a conspiracy theory.
To be sure, internet shills exist. But it's punting, and intellectually lazy, to simply dismiss arguments as, "This guy is arguing X; clearly he's a paid shill."
- QAPereo 9y agoIn the same way that tobacco companies were engaged in a conspiracy... yep.
- marcosdumay 9y agoWait, are you actually claiming Monsanto is not paying for that research, or that they do not have a conflict of interest?
- lumberjack 9y agoSometimes conspiracy theories are correct. https://www.baumhedlundlaw.com/toxic-tort-law/monsanto-roundup-lawsuit/monsanto-secret-documents/ https://www.baumhedlundlaw.com/toxic-tort-law/monsanto-round... And Monsanto overdoes it with their shilling on Reddit to the point where it is so much in your fact that it hurts. I guess they do it in house instead of contracting? They aren't very good at it.
- diogenescynic 9y agoIt's not a theory if it is actually happening. Same thing with gun control and a few other topics. I worked for a public affairs company where I saw mining companies do his first hand. This is more and more common.