4 ms·
Because it does not allow them to protect their content. Their content will still be distributed without their consent, because DRM is broken as quickly as it
by yarrel 9y ago
Because it does not allow them to protect their content.
Their content will still be distributed without their consent, because DRM is broken as quickly as it is implemented.
And they will not be the one using DRM to control distribution of their content, the DRM vendor will be.
Next: why shouldn't I use the magic beans the mafia are offering me to protect my content?
- emodendroket 9y agoThat doesn't really answer the question, does it? If someone wants to lock up their bike with an ineffective lock, it might be a bad idea, but they're not outside of their moral rights to do so.
- MBCook 9y ago> Next: why shouldn't I use the magic beans the mafia are offering me to protect my content? You don’t seriously expect people to engage in a discussion like this do you? As emodendroket pointed out the rest of your comment is the argument against any kind of lock ever. It’s a false dichotomy.