4 ms·
Assuming you didn't mean "disrupting" in the sense of creating a product that replaces Facebook, I would spend the money on a relentless negative media campaign
by gorbachev 9y ago
Assuming you didn't mean "disrupting" in the sense of creating a product that replaces Facebook, I would spend the money on a relentless negative media campaign.
Buy/cultivate influence with sympathetic publications/journalists or create/acquire your own media presence and just hammer them with every negative thing you can find about the management of the company, the business, the users, the content, anything. Pay moles inside the company to leak sensitive information to you.
Then when/if you manage to bring Facebook's reputation down enough, target advertisers with a coordinated campaign to boycott this "horrible" company.
- fleitz 9y agoSo basically you'd Uber them?
- oceanswave 9y agoThere's also the power of lobbyists to 'convince' the government that the company is bad in some manner, who might, in turn, start 'probing' the hell out of the company, much of which will be leaked or reported to the press causing massive amounts of negative perception - even if nothing comes of it. Another is to leverage evangelists with creative donations to lower brand reputation A long term approach might be to instill agents who are loyal to your cause within the company through hiring. Corporate espionage with the intent of making intentional poor decisions in order to cause harm.
- atmosx 9y agoIf you manage to bring down FB via coordinated campaign then you invented a product that it's worth 10 times Facebook.