3 ms·
> it may be time to seriously consider alternatives they have multi-az support if you use it
by benwilber0 9y ago
> it may be time to seriously consider alternatives
they have multi-az support if you use it
- xenophonf 9y agoHow does one set that up?
- rficcaglia 9y agotrue, but some internal AWS features themselves rely on S3 and apparently us-east-1. Those are hosed right now, too. You can't even modify bucket metadata via AWS Console or cli tools. So like checking permissions or logging right now is not possible, or CloudTrail.
- fernandopj 9y agoCodeCommit, CodePipeline and EBS on my environments are all affected. I have a domain down and can't push a new deploy. They are all multi-az.
- zedpm 9y agoNot exactly. S3 doesn't have AZs at all, it's only split on regions. Further, a bucket can exist in only one region. You can set up cross-region replication, but you of course need to flip the bucket coordinates in all your applications to fail over. It's not nearly as easy as Multi-AZ support in things like RDS.
- yeukhon 9y ago> split on regions I think you really meant s3 objects are redundant in each region, which actually is spanned across multiple DCs.
- zedpm 9y agoI meant that a bucket exists in only one region and that you have to replicate to a different bucket if you want to do anything to improve S3 availability.
- BillinghamJ 9y agoS3 is natively cross-AZ. You can’t opt out of that. Active/active cross-region is possible, but far more complex.