5 ms·
I think you read the exact opposite of what GP wrote.
by nardi 9y ago
I think you read the exact opposite of what GP wrote.
- endless1234 9y agoI think GP was just saying that in the case of phones, it's silly to try to make the devices single-user since people are going to want to have their own phone anyway, even if they could log in to their partner's phone and see "their own".
- tw04 9y agoNo, I really didn't. >By default if her phone rings it should only alert on her primary device. Unless she authenticates to my device at which point everything is there waiting. If her phone was ringing and she picks up my device and authenticates it should answer the call. He's talking about each person having their OWN DEVICE, but being able to seamlessly switch between devices among their family group.
- NTripleOne 9y agoWhy are you arguing completely different points then?
- justusthane 9y agoI believe he's arguing against the idea that Apple won't implement this device sharing because they don't want to sell only one device per family.
- quiteawhile 9y agoBecause he is not replying to GP, he is replying to the parent: > Every Apple device, from Macbooks to iPads to iPhones to Airpods is built to be a personal device. (...) Apple doesn’t want to sell one shared device to a family. They want to sell multiple devices to every family member. Not sure why people are having problem understanding that.
- nardi 9y agoOh, you just replied to the wrong comment.